I added my name to the comment section of bug ID 121403. I can test on Win7 or MacOSX. From your experience I think you will have an idea of where the most volunteers will want to test, so you can give me the 10 test cases on the other platform for the best distribution of manpower.
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 3:25 AM, Ji Yan <[email protected]> wrote: > There is only one milestone build which is AOO 3.5. So I think what QA > volunteers can do is testing this milestone build. Once we start 4.0 > feature developing, QA team will follow test plan to do relative test. > > > On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 3:35 AM, Rob Weir <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 2:30 AM, Ji Yan <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > AOO 3.5 milestone build is ready for awhile and now we have more QA > > > volunteer joined. It's time to form a regression test to ensure this > > > milestone build quality. > > > > > > > The most-recent discussions on Dev list talk about 4.0 being the next > > major release, not 3.4. > > > > I assume your task will be the same either way, yes? We still need a > > regression test suite. > > > > -Rob > > > > > I created a QA task [1] for test plan preparing in TestLink and > another > > > task[2] for regression test execution. > > > > > > I'm volunteer to take the first task[1]. Once the test plan ready, > I'll > > > let you know. > > > > > > If any volunteers wants help on this regression execution, please add > > > comments to task[2]. We need 10 volunteers for cases execution, > everyone > > > need to complete 10 cases. > > > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=121402 > > > [2] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=121403 > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 2:07 PM, Ji Yan <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > >> Li Feng, > > >> > > >> Thanks for your SVT report. According to your test result. I think > we > > >> can close following memory leak defects[1]. If no objection, I'll > close > > >> them. > > >> > > >> [1] > > >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?bug_id=120073%2C120050%2C120019%2C119997%2C120074%2C120021%2C120108%2C119992%2C120105%2C120079%2C120675%2C120040%2C116448%2C120106%2C113606%2C120028%2C120098%2C120038%2C120072%2C120077%2C119991&list_id=38828 > > >> > > >> > > >> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 1:19 PM, Li Feng Wang < > [email protected] > > >wrote: > > >> > > >>> Hi, all > > >>> > > >>> Last week, I run SVT cases on Windows 7 64bit with AOO3.5 > > >>> r1400866（r1400866 is the first dev snapshot build on AOO3.5) > > >>> > > >>> Build: > > >>> > > >>> > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds > > >>> > > >>> SVT introduction and scenario description: > > >>> http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/QA/SVT > > >>> 100 iterations, 41 Scenarios, run 24hours. > > >>> > > >>> SVT Report on r1400866: > > >>> There is no obvious upgrade and downgrade compare with r1397404. Just > > one > > >>> problem still exist > > https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=121401. > > >>> Report detail: > > >>> http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/QA/SVTReport/r1400866VSr1397404 > > >>> > > >>> ps: > > >>> http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/QA/SVTReport is the link to collect > > all > > >>> SVT > > >>> report. > > >>> > > >>> Welcome comments! > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> -- > > >>> Best Wishes, LiFeng Wang > > >>> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> -- > > >> > > >> > > >> Thanks & Best Regards, Yan Ji > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > Thanks & Best Regards, Yan Ji > > > > > > -- > > > Thanks & Best Regards, Yan Ji >
