Hi ,
I have question about the bug status, if I am not able to reproduce the bug
what should I change the Status to , there is only two option - Unconfirmed
/ Resolved.

I am putting the steps in the Additional Comments section but just wanted
to confirm on the status issue.

Thanks.
daisy

On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 7:57 AM, Rob Weir <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 11:04 PM, Daisy Ray <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hello ,
> > I was assigned some bugs on DEV300m39 , how do I get hold of the
> > development version.
> >
>
> Hi Daisy -- this is a good question.
>
> What we're ultimately trying to find out is this:  Does the code still
> have this bug today?  If so, what's the easiest way to reproduce the
> bug?  And what is the priority for fixing it?
>
> So all you need to do is test with the most recent released version of
> OpenOffice, the 3.4.1 release that you can download from the website.
> Even if the bug was reported against an earlier version, all we really
> care about is whether the bug still exists in the current release.
>
> Regards,
>
> -Rob
>
> > Thanks.
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 12:24 PM, Rob Weir <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 11:52 AM, AOO Volunteer <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >> > Dear Mr. Weir
> >> > Please assign me reports to confirm.
> >> > I use Debian x64 and prefer Writer and Calc.
> >> > Thank you.
> >> >
> >>
> >> Oh, thank you!
> >>
> >> I just assigned you a batch of bugs reported on 64-bit Linux, Writer and
> >> Calc.
> >>
> >> Send a note to the list if you have any questions!
> >>
> >> -Rob
> >>
> >> > On Tue, Jan 15, 2013, at 18:26, Rob Weir wrote:
> >> >> Welcome again to all QA volunteers, New and Old!
> >> >>
> >> >> If you received this note, that means you are subscribed to the
> >> >> mailing list.  That is good.  It also means that you've received a
> lot
> >> >> of posts from me in recent days.  Sorry about that.  I do try to
> greet
> >> >> each new volunteer personally, and since most new volunteers have
> >> >> similar questions this leads to a lot of repetitive posts.
> >> >>
> >> >> As we all get up to speed to the QA tasks, we'll spend more time
> >> >> discussing the actually QA work.  And at some point others will feel
> >> >> comfortable welcoming our new volunteers as well.  Remember, there is
> >> >> nothing special about me.  If you know the answer to a question, or
> >> >> can point a new volunteer to the Orientation Modules, then please do.
> >> >> Recruiting and training new volunteers is ongoing activity for any
> >> >> thriving open source project.  Indeed, the same is true for any
> >> >> thriving corporation as well.
> >> >>
> >> >> So where do we stand with the QA for OpenOffice?
> >> >>
> >> >> 1) There is a "respin" of AOO 3.4.1 in the works, planned for later
> >> >> this month.  It does not have any code changes, but does have a set
> of
> >> >> additional new translations:  Danish, Norwegian, Swedish, Korean,
> >> >> Polish, Basque, Asturian and Scottish Gaelic.
> >> >>
> >> >> Since the code is unchanged, it is not requiring any functional
> >> >> testing by the QA team.  But the localization team is reviewing the
> >> >> binaries to verify that the menus, dialogs, language tools (spell
> >> >> checking), etc., are working properly.  If you are fluent in any of
> >> >> these 8 languages and want to help with this final review, please
> send
> >> >> a note to the localization mailing list at:
> >> >> [email protected].
> >> >>
> >> >> 2) AOO 4.0 -- We're still waiting for a developer snapshot release
> >> >> that has the UI features added.  When that comes out we can test it.
> >> >> But not yet.
> >> >>
> >> >> 3) Backlog of unconfirmed defect reports.   We have 2984 unconfirmed
> >> >> defects, some dating back several years.  This is an improvement over
> >> >> last week when we had 3016.  But it is still a cause for concern that
> >> >> we have so many.  Why?  Although the severe bugs, the blocking,
> >> >> show-stopper bugs will always get attention, since they are so
> >> >> prominent, the more common place bugs, the ones that effect the
> user's
> >> >> daily experience and their perception of "quality", can get lost in
> >> >> the noise if we're not keeping up with new user bug reports,
> reviewing
> >> >> them and confirming them in a timely fashion.
> >> >>
> >> >> Now obviously this backlog was not created overnight.  It is years in
> >> >> the making.  And we won't eliminate it over night.  But I'd love to
> >> >> make slow & steady progress to get this number down and keep it down.
> >> >>  Twenty volunteers doing ten defect reports a week can eliminate this
> >> >> backlog before AOO 4.0 ships and we get flooded with new bug reports.
> >> >>
> >> >> That is why I am encouraging new volunteers to help with confirming
> >> >> defect reports.  I'm doing the same myself.   If you have not already
> >> >> been assigned a batch to work with, and want to help, let me know
> what
> >> >> platform(s) you can test on, and any special requests (I like Calc,
> >> >> anything but Base, etc.) and I'll get you started.  Or feel free to
> >> >> run the following query in Bugzilla and assign yourself bugs that
> look
> >> >> interesting:
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=runnamed&namedcmd=unconfirmed-defects&list_id=41761
> >> >>
> >> >> (A bug that is currently assigned to "[email protected]"
> or
> >> >> assigned to an address ending in openoffice.org is currently
> >> >> unassigned)
> >> >>
> >> >> Thanks everyone for your hard work!
> >> >>
> >> >> -Rob
> >>
>

Reply via email to