That implies all bugs will get fixed if their priority is above low?
On 6/6/2013 11:32 PM, Edwin Sharp wrote:
Don't be naive.
A bug with a low priority will never get fixed.
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013, at 16:20, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
On 6/6/13 2:13 PM, Edwin Sharp wrote:
you are correct but I believe it is intended to get a priority list. We
have long list of bugs and that can't be fixed all. We always get new
bugs and have to decide o demand if they are critical or not to move a
release.
But in general bugs should be fixed all or should be marked as invalid
or whatever applies.
Juergen
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
