On Wed, Aug 14, 2013, at 22:58, Rob Weir wrote: > > Finally, I think we can all point to a similar open source project > that has numerous betas, but still suffers from poor quality. So a > public beta, by itself, is not sufficient. We need some upstream > improvements as well, I think. But we should do a beta as well. But > aim to have the highest quality beta we can, right? > > Regards, > > -Rob
This comparison is not fair because the release frequency of the two projects is totally different. Quality can also be improved by better community culture. No offense, but I found this inappropriate: On Fri, Jun 7, 2013, at 3:33, Rob Weir wrote: > > I'll try to clean up a few tonight while I watch TV. > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
