Here is the analysis of possible cases for bugs in query [1], together with the proposed instructions to review them, any comments and suggestions, please let me know.
1. New issue happens on new feature in 4.1, or migration issue only applies to 4.1(e.g. *Issue 124437*<https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124437>- Opening password protected files not possible) - Leave the Version field to 4.1 2. New found issue being observed in 4.1 - Determine and refine the Version field to version in which the issue occurs first 3. Regression issue works in 4.0.1 but breaks in 4.1 - Leave the Version field to 4.1 and set the Keywords field to "regression", then specify the comparison build and regression build clearly in Additional *C*omments field Here, let's call for volunteers to assist: 1. Any one who can help on this, please send me your Bugzilla ID, I will send you bug list for your review 2. Any one who has already started reviewing, could you please share and book your bug IDs to avoid duplicated effort among us. Hyperlinks: [1] < https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=dorem&list_id=130944&namedcmd=410_RegressionTest&remaction=run&sharer_id=8583> (shared with "canconfirm") On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 3:53 PM, Jürgen Schmidt <jogischm...@gmail.com>wrote: > On 3/11/14 6:33 PM, Rainer Bielefeld wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I think Bugzilla Help > > <https://issues.apache.org/ooo/describekeywords.cgi> tells it all. > > There only is no common sense whether key word should be used also for > > very old regressions (regression in OOo 1.0.1 compared to OOo 1.0.0), > > from developer's point of view only regressions in AOO 3.4-dev and later > > are of interest. > > <https://www.mail-archive.com/qa@openoffice.apache.org/msg01787.html> > > > > Generally problems with newly integrated features can not be > > regressions. But if the code of a newly integrated feature damages an > > older function so that it does not work correctly since integration, > > that damage deserves key word "regression". > > > > But I do not think that many regression key words will have to be added. > > The problem with the Bugs in the list is that at least one of following > > mistakes is in data for the Bugs: > > * Version has been changed to 4.1 in error, example: > > (Bug 105492 - Text Orientation Degrees Entry Field > > * It has not been tested with what Version the > > bug has appeared, example: > > (Bug 124259 - mathvariant="normal" is ignored on import of .mml file) > > > > So far my personal thoughts, what are result of long co-working in open > > source projects, > > communication is the key here. We have experienced QA volunteers who > know how to set the fields and we have volunteers with less experience. > I suggest that we clean up the various fields and update the how submit > a bug page with a clear and updated explanation of what we think is best. > > If somebody is not sure it is best to let the fields unset or open and > ask on the QA list for support/help. > > Juergen > > > > > > CU > > > > Rainer > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > > -- Regards, Yu Zhen
