On 10/01/2013 01:48 PM, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 02:57:23PM +0400, Ruslan Nigmatullin wrote: >> May be it's a good idea to add boolean option "cpp.cxx11Support" to cpp >> module? >> > that needs to be more generic. > look at the standard version flags gcc has - year, but also > compatibility level (gnu, ansi, pedantic ansi).
This has come up before, and I'm not convinced it makes sense to introduce an abstraction -- how generic could it really be? We'd basically enumerate all the existing compiler options, a lot of which probably do not have counterparts elsewhere, and then people would be writing compiler-specific code anyway. > and of course, the module should do validation, i.e., abort the build > early if the compiler does not support the mode. but that's for later. Yeah, much later... Christian _______________________________________________ QBS mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/qbs
