OK, understood. Thank you! 18.12.2017 14:15, Christian Kandeler пишет:
On Mon, 18 Dec 2017 14:04:21 +0300 Карелин Павел <[email protected]> wrote:In my project, I use the following construction: cpp.defines: { var def = []; if (project.simdDebug) def.push("SIMD_DEBUG"); if (project.useSimd) def.push("USE_SIMD"); return def; } It works fine. But I decided to experiment and do the same through "Properties" Properties { condition: project.simdDebug cpp.defines: outer.concat(["SIMD_DEBUG"]) } Properties { condition: project.useSimd cpp.defines: outer.concat(["USE_SIMD"]) } As a result, I get either SIMD_DEBUG or USE_SIMD at the output, but not both at once. Is it possible to get both values immediately using "Properties"?No, the Properties items form an implicit "else if" chain, so the conditions should be mutually exclusive if the same property appears in more than one of them. They are not well-suited for additive semantics like in your example. Christian _______________________________________________ Qbs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/qbs
_______________________________________________ Qbs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/qbs
