On Wed, 31 Oct 2018 at 23:57, Timur Kristóf <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, 2018-10-31 at 20:45 +1300, Christian Gagneraud wrote: > > > > > > Qbs is open source but the largest part of development has always > > > been > > > shouldered by The Qt Company and the decision processes have never > > > been open > > > and transparent. > > > > It looks to me a bit early to make some plan, give people enough time > > to digest this. > > I'd like to know if the decision to obsolete Qbs is final, or is there > a chance that you guys might still change your mind? > > Taking a look at the blog bost I see a lot of salty comments coming > from Qbs users.
For the record, the blog post in question can be found at http://blog.qt.io/blog/2018/10/29/deprecation-of-qbs/ Chris PS: completely off-topic, has qt.io (aka the Qt Company) ever heard of https everywhere [1]? The Qt mailing list archive is currently serving plain HTTP over HTTPS port [2]. And is redirecting http to https... [1] https://www.eff.org/https-everywhere [2] http://lists.qt-project.org/ _______________________________________________ Qbs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/qbs
