On Tue, 22 Jan 2019 09:23:01 +0100
Christian Gudrian <[email protected]> wrote:
> Am 21.01.2019 um 11:55 schrieb Christian Kandeler:
> > but technically, they aren't the "real" headers, since they are not
> > what you include.
>
> That's true. They are however the header files I edit in QtCreator. And
> it's code model seems to only consider "hpp" tagged files.
Yes, that's true. So maybe the approach with the extra product is the pragmatic
one:
- Tag the headers normally as hpp within your product (i.e. don't do
anything special).
- Have an extra product with only the headers. That one does not need a cpp
dependency. It tags the files suitably and contains/pulls in the Rule that
creates the "real" headers, tagged as hpp. The product should have "hpp" in its
type.
If you have more than one product, then of course you'd use a custom base
item with wildcards.
- The app/lib product gets a dependency on the headers product.
This approach should ensure a correct build and proper highlighting for your
headers in Qt Creator. The only drawback is that you will find your headers
listed twice in the IDE.
Christian
_______________________________________________
Qbs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/qbs
