On Sun, Feb 17, 2019 at 09:10:32PM +0300, Denis Shienkov wrote:
> > For c++ - yes. Imagine a pure javascript rule that doesn’t invoke any
> «compiler» (like cl or javac) but converts some input to output using qbs
> itself. How that custom rule would like?
> 
> But we speak about c/c++ :)
> 
> > What are pros?
> 
> Pros are than I can use then a generated 'native' project on hosts without
> of QBS (just use that 'native' IDE && tools)!  F.e. using a 'native'
> debugger and etc.

One can argue the other way round, too: Why would A have to take care of
"native" export to B when B does not care for importing A?

The soft spot in such cases of interoperability is typically somewhere
in between: Both sides should care somewhat of the other.

Andre'
_______________________________________________
Qbs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/qbs

Reply via email to