On Tue, 16 Jul 2019, 19:00 Oswald Buddenhagen, <oswald.buddenha...@gmx.de> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 06:29:35PM +1200, Christian Gagneraud wrote: > > $ time qbs -f ../qtcreator.qbs profile:qt-5-12-2 > > user 96m51.927s > > sys 19m52.059s > > > > $ time ninja > > user 70m58.028s > > sys 23m9.238s > > > these system time figures appear *waaaay* too high to me. something > funny appears to be going on with your kernel. > Interesting remark, the builds were done inside docker container. Still, they might be good tho, this machine has 28 cores/56 threads. Nonetheless, wall time clearly show that qbs build way more stuff than cmake, and does this in less time. I might collect the load average while building, which will show that Qbs is more efficient. As well, the build time Vs job count graph might give clue. Chris. _______________________________________________ > Qbs mailing list > Qbs@qt-project.org > https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/qbs >
_______________________________________________ Qbs mailing list Qbs@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/qbs
