On 31/07/20 11:03, Christian Kandeler wrote:
> There's probably no harm in adding a "fullName" property containing the
> string from the Depends item. Possibly it could even be the value of "name",
> but I'd have to take a closer look to determine what makes more sense
> semantically.
Maybe we can keep "name" the way it is (after all, it's the name of the
ModuleProvider, so it kind of makes sense that it matches its location)
and add a "dependencyName" property containing the full dependency name.
Incidentally, the following properties of the Depends item could also be
very useful to the module provider:
submodules : stringList
versionAtLeast : string
versionBelow : string
maybe, then, it would make more sense to add a "dependencyInfo" property
as an object containing the three properties above, and the original
"name" from the Depends directive?
Ciao,
Alberto
--
http://www.mardy.it - Geek in un lingua international
_______________________________________________
Qbs mailing list
Qbs@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/qbs
