On 10/26/22 13:38, Christian Kandeler via Qbs wrote:
On 10/26/22 13:24, Иван Комиссаров wrote:
I think, both RPATH and RUNPATH should work.
My understanding is that RUNPATH only affects libraries with a NEEDED
entry, i.e. direct dependencies, while RPATH covers indirect
dependencies as well. What I don't understand is why Pavel's linker
uses RUNPATH and mine uses RPATH by default. Could it be that
distributions patch binutils according to their preferences?
Hm, and now after updating ArchLinux, I also have RUNPATH in my
binaries. So I suppose we do need such a patch?
Christian
_______________________________________________
Qbs mailing list
Qbs@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/qbs
