On Fri, 01/22 14:45, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> On 20.01.2016 09:11, Fam Zheng wrote:
> >For dirty bitmap users to get the size and the name of a
> >BdrvDirtyBitmap.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng <[email protected]>
> >Reviewed-by: John Snow <[email protected]>
> >---
> >  block/dirty-bitmap.c         | 10 ++++++++++
> >  include/block/dirty-bitmap.h |  2 ++
> >  2 files changed, 12 insertions(+)
> >
> >diff --git a/block/dirty-bitmap.c b/block/dirty-bitmap.c
> >index d75dcf7..de143f1 100644
> >--- a/block/dirty-bitmap.c
> >+++ b/block/dirty-bitmap.c
> >@@ -153,6 +153,16 @@ void bdrv_dirty_bitmap_reset_meta(BlockDriverState *bs,
> >      hbitmap_reset(bitmap->meta, sector, nb_sectors);
> >  }
> >+int64_t bdrv_dirty_bitmap_size(BdrvDirtyBitmap *bitmap)
> >+{
> >+    return bitmap->size;
> >+}
> >+
> >+const char *bdrv_dirty_bitmap_name(BdrvDirtyBitmap *bitmap)
> >+{
> >+    return bitmap->name;
> >+}
> 
> Please, s/BdrvDirtyBitmap */const BdrvDirtyBitmap */

Okay, will add.

Fam

> 
> >+
> >  bool bdrv_dirty_bitmap_frozen(BdrvDirtyBitmap *bitmap)
> >  {
> >      return bitmap->successor;
> >diff --git a/include/block/dirty-bitmap.h b/include/block/dirty-bitmap.h
> >index d9b281a..8c29c3e 100644
> >--- a/include/block/dirty-bitmap.h
> >+++ b/include/block/dirty-bitmap.h
> >@@ -32,6 +32,8 @@ uint32_t 
> >bdrv_get_default_bitmap_granularity(BlockDriverState *bs);
> >  uint32_t bdrv_dirty_bitmap_granularity(BdrvDirtyBitmap *bitmap);
> >  bool bdrv_dirty_bitmap_enabled(BdrvDirtyBitmap *bitmap);
> >  bool bdrv_dirty_bitmap_frozen(BdrvDirtyBitmap *bitmap);
> >+const char *bdrv_dirty_bitmap_name(BdrvDirtyBitmap *bitmap);
> >+int64_t bdrv_dirty_bitmap_size(BdrvDirtyBitmap *bitmap);
> >  DirtyBitmapStatus bdrv_dirty_bitmap_status(BdrvDirtyBitmap *bitmap);
> >  int bdrv_get_dirty(BlockDriverState *bs, BdrvDirtyBitmap *bitmap, int64_t 
> > sector);
> >  void bdrv_set_dirty_bitmap(BdrvDirtyBitmap *bitmap,
> 
> 
> -- 
> Best regards,
> Vladimir
> * now, @virtuozzo.com instead of @parallels.com. Sorry for this inconvenience.
> 

Reply via email to