On Sun, Jul 02, 2023 at 06:46:25PM +0900, Akihiko Odaki wrote:
> The ARI next function number field is undefined for VF so the PF should
> end the linked list formed with the field by specifying 0.
>
> This also changes the value of the field for VF; it seems to imply the
> value has some meaning if it differs from one of the PF, but it doesn't.
>
> Fixes: 2503461691 ("pcie: Add some SR/IOV API documentation in
> docs/pcie_sriov.txt")
> Signed-off-by: Akihiko Odaki <[email protected]>
> ---
> docs/pcie_sriov.txt | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/docs/pcie_sriov.txt b/docs/pcie_sriov.txt
> index 7eff7f2703..2b7094dc47 100644
> --- a/docs/pcie_sriov.txt
> +++ b/docs/pcie_sriov.txt
> @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ setting up a BAR for a VF.
> ...
> int ret = pcie_endpoint_cap_init(d, 0x70);
> ...
> - pcie_ari_init(d, 0x100, 1);
> + pcie_ari_init(d, 0x100, 0);
> ...
>
> /* Add and initialize the SR/IOV capability */
> @@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ setting up a BAR for a VF.
> ...
> int ret = pcie_endpoint_cap_init(d, 0x60);
> ...
> - pcie_ari_init(d, 0x100, 1);
> + pcie_ari_init(d, 0x100, 0);
> ...
> memory_region_init(mr, ... )
> pcie_sriov_vf_register_bar(d, bar_nr, mr);
So now code does not match docs.
> --
> 2.41.0
