On 28.03.24 12:40, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Subject: all unions are type-based. Perhaps "support implicit union tags on the wire"?
Yes, sounds good.
Do you need this schema language feature for folding block jobs into the jobs abstraction, or is it just for making the wire protocol nicer in places?
It's not necessary, we can proceed with job-* API, specifying both type and id. But I think, as we are not in a hurry, better to make new job-* API more effective from the beginning. -- Best regards, Vladimir
