Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsement...@yandex-team.ru> writes:

> On 24.04.24 14:48, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsement...@yandex-team.ru> writes:
>> 
>>> Add command to sync config from vhost-user backend to the device. It
>>> may be helpful when VHOST_USER_SLAVE_CONFIG_CHANGE_MSG failed or not
>>> triggered interrupt to the guest or just not available (not supported
>>> by vhost-user server).
>>>
>>> Command result is racy if allow it during migration. Let's allow the
>>> sync only in RUNNING state.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsement...@yandex-team.ru>

[...]

>>> diff --git a/include/sysemu/runstate.h b/include/sysemu/runstate.h
>>> index 0117d243c4..296af52322 100644
>>> --- a/include/sysemu/runstate.h
>>> +++ b/include/sysemu/runstate.h
>>> @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
>>>   #include "qemu/notify.h"
>>>   
>>>   bool runstate_check(RunState state);
>>> +const char *current_run_state_str(void);
>>>   void runstate_set(RunState new_state);
>>>   RunState runstate_get(void);
>>>   bool runstate_is_running(void);
>>> diff --git a/qapi/qdev.json b/qapi/qdev.json
>>> index facaa0bc6a..e8be79c3d5 100644
>>> --- a/qapi/qdev.json
>>> +++ b/qapi/qdev.json
>>> @@ -161,3 +161,24 @@
>>>   ##
>>>   { 'event': 'DEVICE_UNPLUG_GUEST_ERROR',
>>>     'data': { '*device': 'str', 'path': 'str' } }
>>> +
>>> +##
>>> +# @device-sync-config:
>>> +#
>>> +# Synchronize config from backend to the guest. The command notifies
>>> +# re-read the device config from the backend and notifies the guest
>>> +# to re-read the config. The command may be used to notify the guest
>>> +# about block device capcity change. Currently only vhost-user-blk
>>> +# device supports this.
>> 
>> I'm not sure I understand this.  To work towards an understanding, I
>> rephrase it, and you point out the errors.
>> 
>>       Synchronize device configuration from host to guest part.  First,
>>       copy the configuration from the host part (backend) to the guest
>>       part (frontend).  Then notify guest software that device
>>       configuration changed.
>
> Correct, thanks

Perhaps

  Synchronize guest-visible device configuration with the backend's
  configuration, and notify guest software that device configuration
  changed.

  This may be useful to notify the guest of a block device capacity
  change.  Currenrly, only vhost-user-blk devices support this.

Next question: what happens when the device *doesn't* support this?

>> I wonder how configuration can get out of sync.  Can you explain?
>> 
>
> The example (and the original feature, which triggered developing this) is 
> vhost disk resize. If vhost-server (backend) doesn't support 
> VHOST_USER_SLAVE_CONFIG_CHANGE_MSG, neither QEMU nor guest will know that 
> disk capacity changed.

Sounds like we wouldn't need this command if we could make the
vhost-server support VHOST_USER_SLAVE_CONFIG_CHANGE_MSG.  Is making it
support it impractical?  Or are there other uses for this command?

>>> +#
>>> +# @id: the device's ID or QOM path
>>> +#
>>> +# Features:
>>> +#
>>> +# @unstable: The command is experimental.
>>> +#
>>> +# Since: 9.1
>>> +##
>>> +{ 'command': 'device-sync-config',
>>> +  'features': [ 'unstable' ],
>>> +  'data': {'id': 'str'} }
>>> diff --git a/system/qdev-monitor.c b/system/qdev-monitor.c
>>> index 7e075d91c1..cb35ea0b86 100644
>>> --- a/system/qdev-monitor.c
>>> +++ b/system/qdev-monitor.c
>>> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
>>>  #include "monitor/monitor.h"
>>>  #include "monitor/qdev.h"
>>>  #include "sysemu/arch_init.h"
>>> +#include "sysemu/runstate.h"
>>>  #include "qapi/error.h"
>>>  #include "qapi/qapi-commands-qdev.h"
>>>  #include "qapi/qmp/dispatch.h"
>>> @@ -969,6 +970,52 @@ void qmp_device_del(const char *id, Error **errp)
>>>       }
>>>   }
>>>   
>>> +int qdev_sync_config(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
>>> +{
>>> +    DeviceClass *dc = DEVICE_GET_CLASS(dev);
>>> +
>>> +    if (!dc->sync_config) {
>>> +        error_setg(errp, "device-sync-config is not supported for '%s'",
>>> +                   object_get_typename(OBJECT(dev)));
>>> +        return -ENOTSUP;
>>> +    }
>>> +
>>> +    return dc->sync_config(dev, errp);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +void qmp_device_sync_config(const char *id, Error **errp)
>>> +{
>>> +    DeviceState *dev;
>>> +
>>> +    /*
>>> +     * During migration there is a race between syncing`config and
>>> +     * migrating it, so let's just not allow it.
>> 
>> Can you briefly explain the race?
>
> If at the moment of qmp command, corresponding config already migrated to the 
> target, we'll change only the config on source, but on the target we'll still 
> have outdated config.

For RAM, dirty tracking ensures the change gets sent.  But this is
device memory.  Correct?

>>> +     *
>>> +     * Moreover, let's not rely on setting up interrupts in paused
>>> +     * state, which may be a part of migration process.
>> 
>> What dependence exactly are you avoiding?  Config synchronization
>> depending on guest interrupt delivery?
>
> Right, guest is notified by pci_set_irq.

If we allowed it in paused state, the delivery of the interrupt would be
delayed until the guest resumes running.  Correct?

>>> +     */
>>> +
>>> +    if (migration_is_running()) {
>>> +        error_setg(errp, "Config synchronization is not allowed "
>>> +                   "during migration.");
>> 
>> qapi/error.h:
>> 
>>       * The resulting message should be a single phrase, with no newline or
>>       * trailing punctuation.
>> 
>> Drop the period, please.
>
> Will do
>
>> 
>>> +        return;
>>> +    }
>>> +
>>> +    if (!runstate_is_running()) {
>>> +        error_setg(errp, "Config synchronization allowed only in '%s' 
>>> state, "
>>> +                   "current state is '%s'", 
>>> RunState_str(RUN_STATE_RUNNING),
>>> +                   current_run_state_str());
>>> +        return;
>>> +    }
>>> +
>>> +    dev = find_device_state(id, true, errp);
>>> +    if (!dev) {
>>> +        return;
>>> +    }
>>> +
>>> +    qdev_sync_config(dev, errp);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>>   void hmp_device_add(Monitor *mon, const QDict *qdict)
>>>   {
>>>       Error *err = NULL;

[...]


Reply via email to