On 2024/12/02 23:17, Peter Maydell wrote:
On Fri, 29 Nov 2024 at 03:33, Tomoyuki HIROSE
<[email protected]> wrote:
OK, thanks! I got understand. I thought MemoryRegionOps had to be
'static const' .
I will try to improve code so that it does not require the use of
memaccess-testdev.h.inc .
Great. The other thing I thought of this weekend is that
we should document the behaviour in docs/devel/memory.rst.
We could have a new section there that describes how the
core memory code synthesizes accesses that are permitted
by the .valid settings but not handled by the .impl
settings. That way device model authors can know what
happens without having to read the source code.
OK, I will also write the doc as I can.
thanks
-- PMM
thanks,
Tomoyuki HIROSE
