Looks like this patch no longer applies cleanly but looks like the
same cleanup to drop the local array may be fine?

On Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 12:51 PM Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <[email protected]>
> ---
>  hw/virtio/vhost.c | 5 +----
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/virtio/vhost.c b/hw/virtio/vhost.c
> index f9163ba895..e796ad347d 100644
> --- a/hw/virtio/vhost.c
> +++ b/hw/virtio/vhost.c
> @@ -1596,7 +1596,6 @@ int vhost_dev_init(struct vhost_dev *hdev, void *opaque,
>                     VhostBackendType backend_type, uint32_t busyloop_timeout,
>                     Error **errp)
>  {
> -    uint64_t features;
>      int i, r, n_initialized_vqs = 0;
>
>      hdev->vdev = NULL;
> @@ -1616,7 +1615,7 @@ int vhost_dev_init(struct vhost_dev *hdev, void *opaque,
>          goto fail;
>      }
>
> -    r = hdev->vhost_ops->vhost_get_features(hdev, &features);
> +    r = hdev->vhost_ops->vhost_get_features(hdev, &hdev->_features);
>      if (r < 0) {
>          error_setg_errno(errp, -r, "vhost_get_features failed");
>          goto fail;
> @@ -1631,8 +1630,6 @@ int vhost_dev_init(struct vhost_dev *hdev, void *opaque,
>          }
>      }
>
> -    hdev->_features = features;
> -
>      hdev->memory_listener = (MemoryListener) {
>          .name = "vhost",
>          .begin = vhost_begin,
> --
> 2.48.1
>
>

Reply via email to