On Mon 20 Jun 2016 09:14:04 PM CEST, Max Reitz wrote: > Also, I personally wouldn't mind making use of the IDs where trivial. > For example, you can just replace the "'device': 'virtio0'" by "'id': > 'commit1'" in the block-job-complete invocation in 144. Optional, of > course, but would make sense.
My plan was to leave this patch with the minimum necessary changes and then write additional tests for the job ID with all possible scenarios. Berto
