On Tue, 08/02 10:17, Colin Lord wrote: > It sounds like since this series removes dmg from the list of > modularized drivers, there is a libbz2 dependency that may get pulled in > from the dmg driver. I believe Fam was suggesting moving that part of > the dmg driver into its own module (although not modularizing the entire > dmg driver). Does that sound like a correct interpretation Fam? I do
Yes. > like the idea, but I'm a little hesitant to put that into this series > because I'd like to keep this series fairly simple so that hopefully > there doesn't need to be too much more discussion about it. My > internship will be ending soon so I'd prefer this series be finished > sooner rather than later. Also I don't think anything in this series > excludes this idea from being added later if we want. Of course there is > always room for discussion, so if there are other thoughts I'm happy to > listen. I'll prepare a patch that can be applied before this series so that we don't regress on dmg library. Fam
