On 08.05.2017 21:06, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 05/08/2017 01:41 PM, Max Reitz wrote:
>> On 08.05.2017 19:13, Eric Blake wrote:
>>> When converting a 1.1 image down to 0.10, qemu-iotests 060 forces
>>> a contrived failure where allocating a cluster used to replace a
>>> zero cluster reads unaligned data.  Since it is a zero cluster
>>> rather than a data cluster being converted, changing the error
>>> message to match our earlier change in 'qcow2: Make distinction
>>> bewteen zero cluster types obvious' is worthwhile.
>>>
>>> Suggested-by: Max Reitz <[email protected]>
>>> Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <[email protected]>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> There's one more instance of "Data cluster offset" in qcow2-cluster.c,
>>> but that one in handle_copied() is contained inside a
>>> cluster_type == QCOW2_CLUSTER_NORMAL conditional.
>>>
>>>  block/qcow2-cluster.c      | 3 ++-
>>>  tests/qemu-iotests/060.out | 2 +-
>>>  2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> Looks good, except for one thing: This is for qemu-img amend, not
>> qemu-img convert.
>>
>> I can handle that, if you'd like, though. :-)
> 
> So is fixing my commit message considered a conversion, or an amendment?

The git commit parameter is called "--amend", so take your guess. ;-)

Max

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to