On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 05:04:48PM +0200, Alberto Garcia wrote:
On Tue 08 Aug 2017 04:56:20 PM CEST, Manos Pitsidianakis wrote:
So basically if we have anonymous groups, we accept limits in the
driver options but only without a group-name.

In the commit message you do however have limits and a group name, is
that a mistake?

   -drive driver=throttle,file.filename=foo.qcow2, \

Sorry this wasn't clear, I'm actually proposing to remove limits from
the throttle driver options and only create/config throttle groups via

Sorry I think it was me who misunderstood :-) Anyway in the new
command-line API I would be more inclined to have limits defined using
"-object throttle-group" and -drive would only reference the group id.

I understand that this implies that it wouldn't be possible to create
anonymous groups (at least not from the command line), is that a

We can accept anonymous groups if a user specifies limits but not a group name in the throttle driver. (The only case where limits would be acccepted)

Not creating eponymous throttle groups via the throttle driver means we don't need throttle_groups anymore, since even anonymous ones don't need to be accounted for in a list. I will send a new revision for this series but I can make this change in a later patch if everyone agrees.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to