Am 03.10.2017 um 12:25 hat Laurent Vivier geschrieben: > On 03/10/2017 11:57, Thomas Huth wrote: > > The condition of the for-loop makes sure that b is always smaller > > than s->blocks, so the "if (b >= s->blocks)" statement is completely > > superfluous here. > > > > Buglink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1715007 > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <th...@redhat.com> > > --- > > hw/block/onenand.c | 4 ---- > > 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/hw/block/onenand.c b/hw/block/onenand.c > > index 30e40f3..de65c9e 100644 > > --- a/hw/block/onenand.c > > +++ b/hw/block/onenand.c > > @@ -520,10 +520,6 @@ static void onenand_command(OneNANDState *s) > > s->intstatus |= ONEN_INT; > > > > for (b = 0; b < s->blocks; b ++) { > > - if (b >= s->blocks) { > > - s->status |= ONEN_ERR_CMD; > > - break; > > - } > > if (s->blockwp[b] == ONEN_LOCK_LOCKTIGHTEN) > > break; > > > > > > Looks like a bad cut'n'paste from case 0x23. > > Reviewed-by: Laurent Vivier <lviv...@redhat.com>
Thanks, applied to the block branch. Kevin