On Mon 16 Oct 2017 03:38:12 PM CEST, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: >> Another thing that made me a bit sad is that they mention qed as a >> better performing alternative for qcow2. Even in 2017, people keep >> spreading this nonsense. :-( > > Probably because when you google for QED you inevitably hit this article > near the top: > > https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=OTY0MQ > > And there's little clear information on QEMU website to show that QED > is essentially an obsolete experiment.
I remember having to ask on IRC in order to learn what the status of QED was, I couldn't figure it out just by reading the documentation or even the mailing list archives. Berto
