Am 14.02.2018 um 00:33 hat Eric Blake geschrieben:
> I mentioned this while reviewing Berto's series on L2 slice handling;
> this is a first cut at patches that I think are worth doing throughout
> the qcow2 code base if we like the idea.

I agree it's a good change.

While we're at it, something I noticed in your block status series:
If something points to bytes, it should be an 'offset', and if it
points to entries, it's an 'index'. You changed a few things to byte
granularity, but still call them 'index'. Maybe we should clean that up
as well.


Reply via email to