Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 05/08/2018 07:21 AM, Juan Quintela wrote:
>> "Michael S. Tsirkin" <m...@redhat.com> wrote:
>>> When pulling in headers that are in the same directory as C file (as
>>> opposed to one in include/), we should use its relative path, without a
>>> directory. Directory based path works more or less by accident.
>>
>> No, it is not by accident.
>> qemu-version.h and config-host.h are on the root directory.  I could
>> agree with moving them.
>>
>
>>> -#include "migration/qemu-file.h"
>>> +#include "qemu-file.h"
>>
>> Substitite for "./qemu-file.h"?
>>
>> My wonder here is what happens if we end with a file with the same name in
>> two places.
>
> We already have at least:
>
> include/qapi/qmp/qjson.h
> migration/qjson.h
>
> so it's not necessarily a theoretical question (things work now, but
> renaming one or the other header may be in order as part of
> consolidating everything into the /include hierarchy)

Internal ones also?  The whole reason why I moved them to migration/* in
the first place was to be sure that they are internal, and that nobody
else uses them.

Later, Juan.

PD.  And yes, I realize that we include $(ROOT) in the include path, and
then

#include "migration/migration.h" still works from any place.

sniff

Reply via email to