15.08.2019 17:09, Max Reitz wrote: > On 15.08.19 14:10, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote: >> Hi all! >> >> Here is an asynchronous scheme for handling fragmented qcow2 >> reads and writes. Both qcow2 read and write functions loops through >> sequential portions of data. The series aim it to parallelize these >> loops iterations. >> It improves performance for fragmented qcow2 images, I've tested it >> as described below. > > Looks good to me, but I can’t take it yet because I need to wait for > Stefan’s branch to be merged, of course. > > Speaking of which, why didn’t you add any tests for the *_part() > methods? I find it a bit unsettling that nothing would have caught the > bug you had in v2 in patch 3. >
Hmm, any test with write to fragmented area should have caught it.. Ok, I'll think of something. -- Best regards, Vladimir
