20.01.2020 17:18, Max Reitz wrote:
> On 19.12.19 11:03, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
>> store_bitmap_data() loop does bdrv_set_dirty_iter() on each iteration,
>> which means that we actually don't need iterator itself and we can use
>> simpler bitmap API.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <[email protected]>
>> ---
>>   block/qcow2-bitmap.c | 11 +++++------
>>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/block/qcow2-bitmap.c b/block/qcow2-bitmap.c
>> index c6c8ebbe89..015f5d18d2 100644
>> --- a/block/qcow2-bitmap.c
>> +++ b/block/qcow2-bitmap.c
> 
> [...]
> 
>> @@ -1360,19 +1361,17 @@ static uint64_t *store_bitmap_data(BlockDriverState 
>> *bs,
> 
> (One line more context:)
> 
>>           if (end >= bm_size)
>>               break;
>>           }
> 
> Can we drop this now?

Yes, we can, as hbitmap_next_dirty returns -1 in this case.

> 
> If so, and with that done:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Max Reitz <[email protected]>
> 
>>   
>> -        bdrv_set_dirty_iter(dbi, end);
>> +        offset = end;
>>       }
> 


-- 
Best regards,
Vladimir

Reply via email to