Am 26.03.2020 um 14:20 hat Eric Blake geschrieben: > > +++ b/block/file-posix.c > > @@ -3513,6 +3513,8 @@ static BlockDriver bdrv_host_device = { > > .bdrv_reopen_prepare = raw_reopen_prepare, > > .bdrv_reopen_commit = raw_reopen_commit, > > .bdrv_reopen_abort = raw_reopen_abort, > > + .bdrv_co_create_opts = bdrv_co_create_opts_simple, > > + .create_opts = &bdrv_create_opts_simple, > > I'd drop the leading & for consistency with the rest of this struct > initializer.
This one isn't a function pointer, so I think the & is necessary. Kevin