On 25.03.20 14:46, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote: > Simple movement without any change. It's needed for the following > patch, as this function will need to use some staff which is currently
*stuff > below it. Wouldn’t it be simpler to just declare block_copy_task_entry()? Max > Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsement...@virtuozzo.com> > --- > block/block-copy.c | 66 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------- > 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature