On 25.03.20 14:46, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> Simple movement without any change. It's needed for the following
> patch, as this function will need to use some staff which is currently

*stuff

> below it.

Wouldn’t it be simpler to just declare block_copy_task_entry()?

Max

> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsement...@virtuozzo.com>
> ---
>  block/block-copy.c | 66 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
>  1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to