From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <[email protected]> We don't need to check if sd->blk is set twice.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <[email protected]> --- hw/sd/sd.c | 10 +++++----- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/hw/sd/sd.c b/hw/sd/sd.c index a1b25ed36f..060ca9d993 100644 --- a/hw/sd/sd.c +++ b/hw/sd/sd.c @@ -2123,12 +2123,12 @@ static void sd_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp) return; } - if (sd->blk && blk_is_read_only(sd->blk)) { - error_setg(errp, "Cannot use read-only drive as SD card"); - return; - } - if (sd->blk) { + if (blk_is_read_only(sd->blk)) { + error_setg(errp, "Cannot use read-only drive as SD card"); + return; + } + ret = blk_set_perm(sd->blk, BLK_PERM_CONSISTENT_READ | BLK_PERM_WRITE, BLK_PERM_ALL, errp); if (ret < 0) { -- 2.21.3
