29.06.2020 12:36, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
24.06.2020 19:43, Markus Armbruster wrote:
This is to make the next commit easier to review.

Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <[email protected]>
---
  util/qemu-option.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++--------------
  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/util/qemu-option.c b/util/qemu-option.c
index 6119f971a4..9941005c91 100644
--- a/util/qemu-option.c
+++ b/util/qemu-option.c
@@ -270,6 +270,7 @@ static void qemu_opt_del_all(QemuOpts *opts, const char 
*name)
  const char *qemu_opt_get(QemuOpts *opts, const char *name)
  {
      QemuOpt *opt;
+    const QemuOptDesc *desc;
Honestly, I don't see how this hunk helps with the following patch, which is 
simple anyway.
Keeping desc variable scope smaller seems better for me, as well as further 
scope of
def_val. (Still, keep my r-b if you don't want to change it).


Aha, I see, we have more similar patterns and you want them to look similarly. 
Still, it's
better to keep scope of variable smaller. May be a follow-up.

--
Best regards,
Vladimir

Reply via email to