+Sai Pavan
On 8/14/20 6:40 PM, Bin Meng wrote:
> From: Bin Meng <[email protected]>
>
> At present the function switch status data structure bit [399:376]
> are wrongly pupulated. These 3 bytes encode function switch status
> for the 6 function groups, with 4 bits per group, starting from
> function group 6 at bit 399, then followed by function group 5 at
> bit 395, and so on.
>
> However the codes mistakenly fills in the function group 1 status
> at bit 399. This fixes the code logic.
>
Fixes: a1bb27b1e9 ("SD card emulation (initial implementation)")
> Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <[email protected]>
> ---
>
> hw/sd/sd.c | 6 +++++-
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/sd/sd.c b/hw/sd/sd.c
> index fad9cf1..51f5900 100644
> --- a/hw/sd/sd.c
> +++ b/hw/sd/sd.c
> @@ -806,11 +806,15 @@ static void sd_function_switch(SDState *sd, uint32_t
> arg)
> sd->data[11] = 0x43;
> sd->data[12] = 0x80; /* Supported group 1 functions */
> sd->data[13] = 0x03;
> +
> + sd->data[14] = 0;
> + sd->data[15] = 0;
> + sd->data[16] = 0;
Pointless zero initialization.
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <[email protected]>
I'll wait until next week in case Sai Pavan wants to test this
patch (I don't have access to the Xilinx images anymore) then
I'll queue this via my sd-next tree.
Regards,
Phil.
> for (i = 0; i < 6; i ++) {
> new_func = (arg >> (i * 4)) & 0x0f;
> if (mode && new_func != 0x0f)
> sd->function_group[i] = new_func;
> - sd->data[14 + (i >> 1)] = new_func << ((i * 4) & 4);
> + sd->data[16 - (i >> 1)] |= new_func << ((i % 2) * 4);
> }
> memset(&sd->data[17], 0, 47);
> stw_be_p(sd->data + 64, sd_crc16(sd->data, 64));
>
