On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 10:45:00PM +0200, Klaus Jensen wrote: > Finally, I wrote this. I am *NOT* saying that this somehow makes it > better, but as a maintainer, is a big deal to me since both series are > arguably a lot of code to maintain and support (both series are about > the same size). But - I am not the only maintainer, so if Keith (now > suddenly placed in the grim role as some sort of arbiter) signs off on > Dmitry's series, then so be it, I will rest my case.
I think it's neat there's enough interest in ZNS that we have multiple solutions to consider. I'm still catching up from virtual conferencing, but I should be able to have a look over the weekend. I know everyone's put a lot of work into the development of this capability, so maybe there's something to be taken from both? Not sure yet if that's feasible, but I'll have a better idea on that later.
