> -----Original Message-----
> From: Laurent Vivier [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2020 3:11 PM
> To: Li Qiang <[email protected]>
> Cc: Fam Zheng <[email protected]>; ganqixin <[email protected]>;
> [email protected]; Zhanghailiang
> <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Juan Quintela
> <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Qemu Developers
> <[email protected]>; Dr. David Alan Gilbert <[email protected]>;
> Stefan Hajnoczi <[email protected]>; Euler Robot
> <[email protected]>; Chenqun (kuhn) <[email protected]>;
> Max Reitz <[email protected]>; John Snow <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] migration/block-dirty-bitmap: fix uninitialized variable
> warning
>
> Le 13/10/2020 à 03:34, Li Qiang a écrit :
> > Laurent Vivier <[email protected]> 于2020年10月12日周一 下午11:33
> 写道：
> >>
> >> Le 10/10/2020 à 13:07, Chen Qun a écrit :
> >>> This if statement judgment is redundant and it will cause a warning:
> >>>
> >>> migration/block-dirty-bitmap.c:1090:13: warning: ‘bitmap_name’ may
> >>> be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
> >>> g_strlcpy(s->bitmap_name, bitmap_name,
> sizeof(s->bitmap_name));
> >>>
> >>>
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >>>
> >>> Reported-by: Euler Robot <[email protected]>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Chen Qun <[email protected]>
> >>> ---
> >>> migration/block-dirty-bitmap.c | 2 --
> >>> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/migration/block-dirty-bitmap.c
> >>> b/migration/block-dirty-bitmap.c index 5bef793ac0..e09ea4f22b 100644
> >>> --- a/migration/block-dirty-bitmap.c
> >>> +++ b/migration/block-dirty-bitmap.c
> >>> @@ -1084,9 +1084,7 @@ static int dirty_bitmap_load_header(QEMUFile
> *f, DBMLoadState *s,
> >>> } else {
> >>> bitmap_name = s->bitmap_alias;
> >>> }
> >>> - }
> >>>
> >>> - if (!s->cancelled) {
> >>> g_strlcpy(s->bitmap_name, bitmap_name,
> sizeof(s->bitmap_name));
> >>> s->bitmap = bdrv_find_dirty_bitmap(s->bs,
> >>> s->bitmap_name);
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> I don't think it's correct as "cancel_incoming_locked(s)" can change
> >> the value of "s->cancelled".
> >>
> >
> > Hi Laurent,
> >
> > You're right. So I think this can simply assign 'bitmap_name' to NULL
> > to make compiler happy.
>
> Yes, and adding a comment before the second "if (!s->cancelled) {" to explain
> the value can be changed by "cancel_incoming_locked(s)" would avoid to have
> this kind of patch posted regularly to the ML.
>
Hi Laurent,
We give the bitmap_name a default value (s->bitmap_alias) so that we can remove
the assignment of the else branch statement.
And then we merge the two if statements("if (!s->cancelled)", "if
(bitmap_alias_map)") , avoids confusion the two "if (!s->cancelled)".
Thanks,
Chen Qun
The code show as that:
@@ -1064,15 +1064,14 @@ static int dirty_bitmap_load_header(QEMUFile *f,
DBMLoadState *s,
assert(nothing || s->cancelled || !!alias_map == !!bitmap_alias_map);
if (s->flags & DIRTY_BITMAP_MIG_FLAG_BITMAP_NAME) {
- const char *bitmap_name;
+ const char *bitmap_name = s->bitmap_alias;
if (!qemu_get_counted_string(f, s->bitmap_alias)) {
error_report("Unable to read bitmap alias string");
return -EINVAL;
}
- if (!s->cancelled) {
- if (bitmap_alias_map) {
+ if (!s->cancelled && bitmap_alias_map) {
bitmap_name = g_hash_table_lookup(bitmap_alias_map,
s->bitmap_alias);
if (!bitmap_name) {
@@ -1081,9 +1080,6 @@ static int dirty_bitmap_load_header(QEMUFile *f,
DBMLoadState *s,
s->bs->node_name, s->node_alias);
cancel_incoming_locked(s);
}
- } else {
- bitmap_name = s->bitmap_alias;
- }
}
if (!s->cancelled) {
