On Sat 09 Jan 2021 01:58:11 PM CET, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> Keep setting ret close to setting errp and don't merge different error
> paths into one. This way it's more obvious that we don't return
> error without setting errp.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsement...@virtuozzo.com>
I get the idea, but I feel the code is getting innecessarily verbose.
One alternative would be to get rid of all -EINVAL inside the switch
block, take advantage of the existing local_err and follow the block
with:
if (local_err) {
error_propagate(errp, local_err);
ret = -EINVAL;
goto fail;
}
But otherwise your solution is correct, so you can keep it if you
prefer:
Reviewed-by: Alberto Garcia <be...@igalia.com>
Berto
