On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 03:30:16PM -0300, Wainer dos Santos Moschetta wrote: > Hi, > > On 2/11/21 7:01 PM, Cleber Rosa wrote: > > Closing a file that is open for writing, and then reading from it > > sounds like a better idea than the opposite, given that the content > > will be flushed. > > > > Reference: https://docs.python.org/3/library/io.html#io.IOBase.close > > Signed-off-by: Cleber Rosa <[email protected]> > > --- > > python/qemu/machine.py | 4 ++-- > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/python/qemu/machine.py b/python/qemu/machine.py > > index 7a40f4604b..6e44bda337 100644 > > --- a/python/qemu/machine.py > > +++ b/python/qemu/machine.py > > @@ -337,12 +337,12 @@ class QEMUMachine: > > self._qmp.close() > > self._qmp_connection = None > > - self._load_io_log() > > - > > if self._qemu_log_file is not None: > > self._qemu_log_file.close() > > self._qemu_log_file = None > > + self._load_io_log() > > + > > > IMO it's a too fragile fix. It needs the `self._qemu_log_file.close()` being > called before `self._load_io_log()` but a future change can make this > condition unmet again. Maybe you could document that in the code. Or change > the `_load_io_log()` to close the log file if it is open (also document it > in code). > > - Wainer >
I'm glad you see this is needed... and then something else. I'll investigate making this more robust as time allows it. Question is: do you ack/nack this change? Cheers, - Cleber.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
