On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 10:06:49AM +0100, Klaus Jensen wrote: > On Feb 16 16:19, Keith Busch wrote: > > The verify implementation looked fine, but lacking a generic backing for > > it sounds to me the use cases aren't there to justify taking on this > > feature. > > Please check my reply on the verify patch - can you elaborate on > "generic backing"? I'm not sure I understand what you have in mind, > API-wise.
I meant it'd be nice if qemu block api provided a function like "blk_aio_pverify()" to handle the details that you're implementing in the nvme device. As you mentioned though, handling the protection information part is problematic.
