On 3/12/21 3:01 AM, Thomas Huth wrote:
That whole table-based approach seems quite unreliable to me - I've seen
floppy disks with 80, 81, 82 or sometimes even 83 tracks in the past, so
I think we would do better with a more flexible way of guessing ... but
for the time being, this is certainly a quick and easy fix that also
should not have any negative impact, thus:
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <[email protected]>
Yes, that's my thought. I can't personally justify tackling this hokey
system -- I simply don't know enough about the history of the device to
design a suitable replacement.
So, it's a band-aid, but one that fits with the way the floppy has
worked for quite a long time, and seems the least likely to bother
anything further.
--js
