On 4/1/21 12:07 PM, Max Reitz wrote:
On 01.04.21 18:52, Max Reitz wrote:
On 01.04.21 17:52, Connor Kuehl wrote:
The deprecation message changed slightly at some point in the past but
the expected output wasn't updated along with it; causing it to fail.
Fix it, so it passes.

Signed-off-by: Connor Kuehl <[email protected]>
---
  tests/qemu-iotests/231.out | 4 +---
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)

Uh, well, you know what, I can’t find any version where there was any other output.  Even back in 66e6a735e97450ac50fcaf40f78600c688534cae, where this test was introduced, I get this diff.

What’s going on there?

Okay.  So:

Jeff’s original patch[1] included the “Future versions may cease to parse...” part.  v1 of his subsequent pull request[2] did, too.  But v2[3] didn’t.  Looks like Markus made a comment on v4 of the patch, and then Jeff fixed up the patch in his branch, but didn’t change the test.  In any case it’s clear that the reference output was wrong all along.

About the “no monitors specified” part...  The only place where I can find “no monitors” is in Jeff’s patches to add this iotest.  I have no idea where that orignated from.

So:

Reviewed-by: Max Reitz <[email protected]>

Thanks! And excellent sleuthing. This accidental conspiracy went much farther beyond the git log than I thought...

Connor



[1]
https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-block/2018-09/msg00282.html

[2]
https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-block/2018-09/msg00307.html

[3]
https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-block/2018-09/msg00592.html



Reply via email to