Am 11/07/2022 um 17:57 schrieb Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy: > That seems a lot closer! > > Now I'm going to vocation from tomorrow up to the end of week, so I'll > return next Monday. > > > On 7/6/22 23:15, Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito wrote: >> In this series, we want to remove the AioContext lock and instead >> use the already existent job_mutex to protect the job structures >> and list. This is part of the work to get rid of AioContext lock >> usage in favour of smaller granularity locks. >> [..] > > Thank you for the review! Assume that all suggestion I did not reply will be applied. Apart from patch 12 and 19, all other patches should be reviewed :) Emanuele
- [PATCH v9 13/21] job: detect change of aiocon... Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
- Re: [PATCH v9 13/21] job: detect change ... Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
- [PATCH v9 09/21] jobs: use job locks also in ... Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
- Re: [PATCH v9 09/21] jobs: use job locks... Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
- Re: [PATCH v9 09/21] jobs: use job l... Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
- Re: [PATCH v9 09/21] jobs: use j... Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
- Re: [PATCH v9 09/21] jobs: u... Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
- [PATCH v9 16/21] block_job_query: remove atom... Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
- Re: [PATCH v9 16/21] block_job_query: re... Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
- Re: [PATCH v9 00/21] job: replace AioContext ... Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
- Re: [PATCH v9 00/21] job: replace AioCon... Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
