On Tuesday 16 January 2007 08:25, Christian MICHON wrote: > based on *quick* benchs and without entering too much in detail > (in case I'd violate EULA), it seems faster than qemu+kqemu on > windows hosts :(
Why is that a bad thing? VirtualBox is GPL, kqemu is not, so I'd say VirtualBox being faster is a good thing. It means there's no need for proprietary kernel modules. Paul _______________________________________________ Qemu-devel mailing list Qemu-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel
