---- malc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 26 Feb 2007, Ben Taylor wrote: > > [..snip..] > > >> From where i stand SDL as the default is a bad idea. > > > > Solaris without OSS audio doesn't have any other options. > > There is no ALSA, and AFAIK, there isn't an fmod either. > > > > However, I still think it is probably a good idea to have the > > QEMU_SDL_AUDIO device default to the audio subsystem > > that is defined (or defaulted to). Thoughts? > > I'm somewhat lost, there's no QEMU_SDL_AUDIO, furthermore there's > no way to tell SDL what subsystem to use other than setting the > environment variable.
Sorry. I had a brain fart. I meant QEMU_AUDIO_DRV. And after looking at the code, it appears to be smart enough to pick the right audio subsystem. I just remember having to fiddle with QEMU_AUDIO_DRV when I was trying to figure out a previous problem with audio occurred (like 18 months ago) > And to reiterate the point: NetBSD, OpenBSD and Solaris do not > have full fledged OSS, they provide a wrapper that implements > some basic functionality. The native thing for them is SUN audio[1] > (more or less). And there's no QEMU driver for that. Options for > those system include: OSS wrapper provided with the system, 4Front > drivers and SDL (if it can use /dev/audio at all). Well, it appears to use SDL in that case where there is no OSS. > Only 4Front's solution will allow DAC/ADC because it is basically > full blown OSS implementation. Unless, ofcourse, native `/dev/audio' > QEMU driver is written. > > [1] http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/816-0222/6m6nmlssf?q=audio&a=view Thanks for the clarification. Guess I'll just go ahead an use the OSS stuff. Regards, Ben _______________________________________________ Qemu-devel mailing list Qemu-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel
