On 2023/10/23 23:49, David Hildenbrand wrote:
Why? On 23.10.23 17:29, Jiajie Chen wrote:Signed-off-by: Jiajie Chen <c...@jia.je> --- include/exec/memop.h | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/include/exec/memop.h b/include/exec/memop.h index a86dc6743a..834327c62d 100644 --- a/include/exec/memop.h +++ b/include/exec/memop.h @@ -140,6 +140,7 @@ typedef enum MemOp { MO_TEUL = MO_TE | MO_UL, MO_TEUQ = MO_TE | MO_UQ, MO_TEUO = MO_TE | MO_UO, + MO_TESB = MO_TE | MO_SB, MO_TESW = MO_TE | MO_SW, MO_TESL = MO_TE | MO_SL, MO_TESQ = MO_TE | MO_SQ,I recall that the reason for not having this is that the target endianess doesn't matter for single bytes.
Thanks, you are right, I was copying some code using MO_TESW only to find that MO_TESB is missing... I should simply use MO_SB then.
