On 03/06/2012 04:14 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 06/03/2012 08:16, Mark Wu ha scritto:
It seems we need a name for the union to reference its member.
What version is your compiler?
So I
modified the scripts as the following patch. I also updated blockdev.c
accordingly. After that I can compile it without error. Actually, I
don't know why we need introduce a union for BlockdevAction. Can we just
use a void pointer like "void *action_param" to replace the union? Or
can we change the field ."snapshot_file to "target" too? Then they can
share the same action parameter structure.
No, the struct must match the existing blockdev-snapshot-sync command.
Paolo
gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
Target: x86_64-redhat-linux
Configured with: ../configure --prefix=/usr --mandir=/usr/share/man
--infodir=/usr/share/info
--with-bugurl=http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla --enable-bootstrap
--enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --enable-checking=release
--with-system-zlib --enable-__cxa_atexit --disable-libunwind-exceptions
--enable-gnu-unique-object
--enable-languages=c,c++,objc,obj-c++,java,fortran,ada
--enable-java-awt=gtk --disable-dssi
--with-java-home=/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.5.0-gcj-1.5.0.0/jre
--enable-libgcj-multifile --enable-java-maintainer-mode
--with-ecj-jar=/usr/share/java/eclipse-ecj.jar
--disable-libjava-multilib --with-ppl --with-cloog --with-tune=generic
--with-arch_32=i686 --build=x86_64-redhat-linux
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.4.5 20110214 (Red Hat 4.4.5-6) (GCC)
