On 11/3/23 12:59, Alex Bennée wrote:
--- a/plugins/api.c +++ b/plugins/api.c @@ -89,7 +89,11 @@ void qemu_plugin_register_vcpu_tb_exec_cb(struct qemu_plugin_tb *tb, void *udata) { if (!tb->mem_only) { - plugin_register_dyn_cb__udata(&tb->cbs[PLUGIN_CB_REGULAR], + int index = flags == QEMU_PLUGIN_CB_R_REGS || + flags == QEMU_PLUGIN_CB_RW_REGS ? + PLUGIN_CB_REGULAR_R : PLUGIN_CB_REGULAR; +
I'd really rather you reject QEMU_PLUGIN_CB_RW_REGS entirely, rather than implement it with incorrect semantics.
Otherwise, Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.hender...@linaro.org>
+ plugin_register_dyn_cb__udata(&tb->cbs[index], cb, flags, udata); } } @@ -109,7 +113,11 @@ void qemu_plugin_register_vcpu_insn_exec_cb(struct qemu_plugin_insn *insn, void *udata) { if (!insn->mem_only) { - plugin_register_dyn_cb__udata(&insn->cbs[PLUGIN_CB_INSN][PLUGIN_CB_REGULAR], + int index = flags == QEMU_PLUGIN_CB_R_REGS || + flags == QEMU_PLUGIN_CB_RW_REGS ? + PLUGIN_CB_REGULAR_R : PLUGIN_CB_REGULAR; + + plugin_register_dyn_cb__udata(&insn->cbs[PLUGIN_CB_INSN][index], cb, flags, udata); } }