On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 04:56:28PM +0200, Manos Pitsidianakis wrote: > > However, can't we define a simpler more specific policy? > > For example, isn't it true that *any* automatically generated code > > can only be included if the scripts producing said code > > are also included or otherwise available under GPLv2? > > The following definition makes sense to me: > > - Automated codegen tool must be idempotent. > - Automated codegen tool must not use statistical modelling.
Why does it matter so much? > I'd remove all AI or LLM references. These are non-specific, colloquial and > in the case of `AI`, non-technical. This policy should apply the same to a > Markov chain code generator. -- MST
