In this version I rebased the series on REGPARM removal, without
splitting i386 and x86_64.

I've also made some simple performance tests on i386. It looks like
REGPARM removal accounts for 2.5% performance loss and the full series
7.5%, in total 10% loss in this test.

I'd like to move on with the series, so if nobody produces figures
with other targets that show such loss, I'll commit the series next
weekend.

URL     git://repo.or.cz/qemu/blueswirl.git
        http://repo.or.cz/r/qemu/blueswirl.git

Blue Swirl (5):
  i386: Remove REGPARM
  softmmu templates: optionally pass CPUState to memory access
    functions
  TCG: add 5 arg helpers to def-helper.h
  Sparc: avoid AREG0 for memory access helpers
  Sparc: avoid AREG0 wrappers for memory access helpers

 Makefile.target            |   12 +-
 configure                  |    7 +
 cpu-all.h                  |    9 +
 def-helper.h               |   26 +++
 exec-all.h                 |    2 +
 exec.c                     |    4 +
 osdep.h                    |    6 -
 softmmu_defs.h             |   60 +++++--
 softmmu_header.h           |   60 +++++--
 softmmu_template.h         |   86 ++++++---
 target-sparc/cpu.h         |    3 +-
 target-sparc/helper.h      |   20 +-
 target-sparc/ldst_helper.c |  415 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
 target-sparc/op_helper.c   |   74 --------
 target-sparc/translate.c   |   62 ++++---
 tcg/arm/tcg-target.c       |   53 ++++++
 tcg/hppa/tcg-target.c      |   44 +++++
 tcg/i386/tcg-target.c      |  169 ++++++++++++------
 tcg/ia64/tcg-target.c      |   46 +++++
 tcg/mips/tcg-target.c      |   44 +++++
 tcg/ppc/tcg-target.c       |   45 +++++
 tcg/ppc/tcg-target.h       |    2 +-
 tcg/ppc64/tcg-target.c     |   44 +++++
 tcg/s390/tcg-target.c      |   44 +++++
 tcg/sparc/tcg-target.c     |   50 +++++-
 tcg/tcg.c                  |   14 --
 tcg/tcg.h                  |    7 +-
 tcg/tci/tcg-target.c       |    6 +
 28 files changed, 966 insertions(+), 448 deletions(-)
 delete mode 100644 target-sparc/op_helper.c

-- 
1.7.9

Reply via email to