On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 15:51:04 +0100 Kevin Wolf <kw...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Am 09.03.2012 20:57, schrieb Luiz Capitulino: > > On Fri, 9 Mar 2012 16:48:10 -0300 > > Luiz Capitulino <lcapitul...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > >>> It's certainly possible to make the synchronous monitor command spit out > >>> status > >>> as it already uses a polling loop to determine when migration completes. > >> > >> As HMP now uses QMP as a real client, we'd have to make that information > >> available for all QMP users. Best place is probably query-migrate. > >> > >> Don't you prefer to drop the whole thing instead? :-) > > > > Oh, we actually have block migration information in query-migrate already, > > maybe we can use that to have a progress bar (not sure it's the same info > > used by current progress bar though). > > > > But dropping it is still a viable alternative :) > > We should use the decoupling of the human monitor to make it better > rather than worse. :-) I've implemented the progress counting and will submit a new version of the series later today.
